Robotics

Introduction to Marine Robotics

The LEGO EV3 control brick (EV3 brick) contains batteries, a microcontroller, input buttons and a screen.  LEGO originally made a block coding system to program it, but this has been discontinued.  Also, your teacher is not a fan of block coding.  A non-profit organisation called Pybricks has created a system where the EV3 brick can now be programmed using MicroPython instead.  This is a streamlined version of the usual Python language.  It has been installed via SD cards onto the EV3 brick.  The coding is done via a common editor known as Visual Studio Code.

Module 1 – Design Challenge

Course: Build an Underwater ROV While Learning Physics
Suggested Duration: 2–3 hours (self-paced) or 2 × 75-minute class periods
Level: College Physics / AP Physics 1 entry point (scalable upward)

Learning Objectives

By the end of this module, students will be able to:

  1. Explain what an ROV is and describe its real-world applications in ocean science and industry
  2. Identify the key subsystems of an underwater ROV (frame, propulsion, power, control, sensors)
  3. Apply the engineering design process to propose an initial ROV design
  4. Draw and analyse a free body diagram for a submerged object
  5. Identify the forces acting on an ROV during hover, ascent, and descent

📖 Section 1: What Is an ROV?

1.1 Definition & Overview

  • ROV = Remotely Operated Vehicle
  • Uncrewed, tethered, operated from the surface
  • Distinction between ROVs, AUVs (Autonomous Underwater Vehicles), and crewed submersibles

1.2 Real-World Examples

  • NOAA: Deep-sea exploration, seafloor mapping, shipwreck documentation
  • BIOS (Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences): Local research deployments — coral reef monitoring, water column sampling
  • Industry: Oil & gas pipeline inspection, offshore wind farm maintenance, cable laying
  • Search & Rescue: Locating the Titanic (Alvin/Jason Jr.), MH370 search
  • Military: Mine detection and disposal

1.3 The Bermuda Connection

  • Bermuda’s unique position: isolated seamount in the North Atlantic, surrounded by deep water (>4,000 m within 50 km)
  • Local ROV use cases: coral reef surveys, shipwreck exploration (Bermuda has 300+ documented wrecks), invasive lionfish monitoring
  • BIOS partnership opportunity: link to real Bermuda ocean data and research
  • Discussion prompt: “If you could deploy an ROV anywhere around Bermuda, where would you go and what would you look for?”

🔧 Section 2: Anatomy of an ROV

2.1 Key Subsystems

SubsystemFunctionPhysics Connection
Frame & HullStructural support, buoyancy controlArchimedes’ Principle, density
PropulsionMovement in 3D spaceNewton’s 3rd Law, fluid dynamics
Power SystemElectrical energy supplyDC circuits, power, energy
Control SystemPilot input → motor responseElectromagnetism, signal transmission
Sensors & CamerasData collection, navigationOptics, pressure, temperature
TetherPower and signal transmissionResistance, signal attenuation

2.2 ROV Size Classes

  • Micro/Mini: Educational builds (e.g., OpenROV, Blue Robotics) — what we will build
  • Work-class: Industrial ROVs (e.g., Schilling Robotics UHD) — up to 3,000 kg
  • Trenching/burial: Massive cable-laying systems

2.3 Our Build Target

  • PVC-frame ROV with 3–4 thrusters
  • Arduino-based control system
  • Waterproofed camera
  • Operating depth: 0–5 m (pool/shallow water testing)
  • Estimated cost: \$150–\$400 depending on components

⚙️ Section 3: The Engineering Design Process

3.1 Overview of the Process

  1. Define the problem and constraints
  2. Research existing solutions
  3. Brainstorm design ideas
  4. Prototype and build
  5. Test and evaluate
  6. Iterate — redesign based on results

3.2 Design Constraints for This Project

  • Budget limit (set by teacher/student)
  • Must be neutrally buoyant at operating depth
  • Must be controllable via tether from surface
  • Must survive submersion to at least 2 m
  • Must complete at least one defined underwater task (e.g., retrieve an object, photograph a target)

3.3 Design Challenge Activity

Task: Before building anything, sketch your initial ROV design.

  • Label all subsystems
  • Indicate where you think the centre of mass and centre of buoyancy will be
  • Justify your thruster placement — how will you achieve movement in each direction?
  • Identify your three biggest design uncertainties

Format: Hand-drawn sketch + short written justification (1 paragraph per subsystem)


⚡ Section 4: Physics Foundation — Forces on a Submerged Object

4.1 The Four Key Forces

  • Weight W=mg — acts downward through the centre of mass
  • Buoyant Force Fb=fluidVdisplacedg — acts upward through the centre of buoyancy
  • Thrust FT — provided by propellers, direction depends on thruster orientation
  • Drag FD=12CDAv2 — opposes motion, depends on shape and speed

4.2 Free Body Diagrams

  • Hovering (neutral buoyancy): Fb=W, no vertical thrust needed
  • Ascending: Fb+FTup>W+FDdown
  • Descending: W+FTdown>Fb+FDup
  • Moving horizontally: horizontal thrust must overcome horizontal drag

4.3 Why Neutral Buoyancy Matters

  • If Fb=W, the ROV hovers without using thruster power for depth control
  • Conserves battery life
  • Allows precise depth holding
  • Design implication: Frame material, electronics housing, and ballast must be carefully chosen and balanced

4.4 Worked Example

An ROV has a mass of 2.4 kg. Its frame displaces 2.8 litres of seawater (=1025 kg/m3).

  1. Calculate the weight of the ROV.
  2. Calculate the buoyant force.
  3. Is the ROV positively, negatively, or neutrally buoyant?
  4. How much ballast mass would you need to add to achieve neutral buoyancy?

✅ Section 5: Self-Check Quiz

  1. What is the difference between an ROV and an AUV?
  2. Name three real-world applications of ROVs.
  3. List the six subsystems of an ROV and the physics concept associated with each.
  4. A submerged object has weight 15 N and buoyant force 18 N. What is the net force and in which direction does it act?
  5. Why is neutral buoyancy desirable in an ROV design?

🔬 Section 6: Lab Activity — Buoyancy Exploration

Purpose

To experimentally verify Archimedes’ Principle and explore how material choice affects buoyancy.

Materials

  • Spring scale or digital balance
  • Overflow container or graduated cylinder
  • Water tank or large bucket
  • Various objects (PVC pipe, foam, metal rod, plastic bottle)
  • String

Procedure

  1. Measure the weight of each object in air.
  2. Submerge each object and measure the apparent weight using the spring scale.
  3. Collect the displaced water and measure its volume.
  4. Calculate the buoyant force two ways: (a) Fb=Wair−Wwater and (b) Fb=waterVdisplacedg
  5. Compare results and calculate percentage difference.

Analysis Questions

  • Do your two methods agree? What sources of error might explain any discrepancy?
  • Which material would make the best ROV frame? Justify using your data.
  • How would your results change in seawater vs. freshwater?

💬 Section 7: Reflection & Discussion

  • “What surprised you most about how ROVs work?”
  • “Which subsystem do you think will be the most challenging to build? Why?”
  • “How does the physics of buoyancy constrain your design choices before you even pick up a tool?”
  • “If you were designing an ROV for Bermuda’s deep water (1,000 m+), how would your design need to change?”

➡️ Coming Up: Module 2 — Buoyancy & Ballast

In Module 2, we go deeper (literally) into Archimedes’ Principle, pressure at depth, and the practical challenge of achieving and maintaining neutral buoyancy as your ROV takes shape.